kristen Kristen Lavransdatter   The Cross and final thoughts

Kristin Lavransdatter (The Wreath, The Wife, The Cross)
Sigrid Undset
Translated by Tiina Nunnally
first published 1920-1922
1168 pages

********************

I bought this book awhile ago. Probably before the FTC needs to know about it. But I’m all about covering my butt.

********************

For my thoughts on the first two parts of this book, check out The Wreath and The Wife.

At the risk of sounding like a horrible awful person, I’ll admit that I was looking forward to The Cross. Going into Kristin Lavransdatter you know that it is Kristin’s life story and that she dies at the end. And her death means the end of the book. I can’t tell you how much I was looking forward to that. I don’t know that I’ve ever been so happy that a fictional character died. See, I told you that I’m a horrible awful person.

So what happened to make me anticipate Kristin’s death? I started out enjoying Kristin Lavransdatter. Why did I want so badly for her to die? Well, 1100 plus pages of angst and whining happened. This book could have EASILY been 500 pages (and 5 kids) shorter. Trust me, nothing would have been lost.

Oh wait. The Cross. Book 3. I forgot to tell you what happens. Except it’s been awhile, so I’ve kinda forgotten the details. I do remember that Kristin got herself to a nunnery. The plague hit. Kristin had a heroic moment. The end.

Back to my overall impressions.

While certainly not the worst book I’ve ever read (Too Much Tuscan Sun and Foolhold that honor), I stand by my earlier statement that this book needed some brutal editing. Undset liked sweeping sagas, but this one lacked continuous originality (to totally make up a phrase). Instead, you get lather, rinse, repeat. Kristin has a son, she gets all moody and pissy at Erlend, it happens all over again. I swear that felt like 500 pages of filler.

If you are thinking about reading this (although we’ve probably scared you off), I highly recommend a read-along (and many thanks to Richard of Caravana de Recuerdos and Emily of Evening All Afternoon for organizing this one!). It helps to have the emotional support, and it’s nice to have fellow readers to pick up the slack and write reviews that actual contain thought and content. :-D

 

moby dick button

Here we are back at Moby Dick Monday and I’m once again caught up on my reading.

I’m about 1/3 of the way (I’m on page 204 of 625) through this whale of book, and I think Billy has the right idea in boycotting Melville. Moby Dick still hasn’t made an appearance, although Ahab has, and he’s offered up a reward to the first man who sights him. You’d think that would spark some action, but no. Some random observations:

  • Flask (the third mate) is quite the chatty Cathy. I do believe there was one chapter made up entirely of his commentary. Granted, the chapter was only one page, but he still rambles on.
  • Just like the author! Did they not have editors in the 1800s?!? And did anyone else notice that the longest chapter (they usually average 3-4 pages), at 12 freakin’ pages, was Cetalogy? Melville rhapsodized about types of whales for 12 pages. I will confess to skimming, because good lord, was that ever boring.
  • Why are there two chapters (26 and 27) titled Knights and Squires? Really, one was enough.
  • The language. This book illustrates all of my prejudices against classics. It’s long. It’s boring. And the language…it makes my head hurt. Call me shallow, but I don’t want to think this hard, especially about whaling.

“In behalf of the dignity of whaling, I would fain advance naught but substantiated facts. But after embattling his facts, an advocate who should wholly suppress a not unreasonable surmise, which might tell eloquently upon his cause – such an advocate, would he not be blameworthy?”

  • You may have guessed that I’m less than impressed. And you’d be right. Every time I pick up the book and start reading I have a compulsion to scream “get to the !@#$%^& point!” However, I keep reading, because like Ahab, I’m determined to conquer this damn whale.
 

Moby Dick Monday

moby dick button

Today, I have nothing. I haven’t picked up the whale since last Sunday. I had plans to catch up on my reading on my days off, but I forgot to take into account the fact that we spent yesterday at my mom’s celebrating Christmas, and today, I’m at work. Luckily, next weekend will be a four day weekend, so I’ll have time then to get caught up.

In the meantime, Billy has a few things he’d like to say:

001 300x225 Moby Dick Monday

002 300x225 Moby Dick Monday


 

moby dick button

After lagging on my reading last week, I’ve now caught up and am back in the game. I’m on page 90 of Moby Dick, and while it’s a bit (okay, a lot) long winded at times, and there are biblical references up the wazoo that I’m not getting, it’s not as torturous as I expected.

Billy, on the other hand, was reading along with me until page 86, when we got to this line:

“Bildad, say that again to me, and start my soul-bolts, but I’ll – I’ll – yes, I’ll swallow a live goat with all his hair and horns on.”

Billy is now boycotting Melville. In fact, I think he’s making a picket sign.

So. A few random thoughts…

  • 90 pages, and still no Ahab. No whale, either. There has been mention of both, but Melville is still setting the stage.
  • There seems to be some heavy foreshadowing…an inn-keeper named Coffin, the shadow of the gallows, a painting of a whale attacking a ship, a sermon about Jonah and the whale. If I were a betting gal, I’d say something bad is going to happen.
  • Melville likes to flip his word order (”the night previous”). He’s also fond of alliteration.

That’s all I’ve got. Maybe by next week we’ll have met Ahab. I’m not holding my breath, though.

 

kristen Kristin Lavransdattar, The Wife

For the read-a-long of Kristin Lavransdatter (organized by Richard of Caravana de Recuerdos and Emily of Evening All Afternoon), we’re reading a book a month. Last month, I posted my thoughts on the first book, The Wreath. This month we’re focusing on book two, The Wife.

Unfortunately, I made the mistake of finishing the entire book before I wrote up my thoughts on The Wife. Therefore, this will be brief.

The Wife can be summed up like this:

Kristin has a baby boy
She has another baby boy.
And another.
And whoa. Twins. Twin boys.
And then she has another baby. And you guessed it. It’s a boy.

I might be off on where the twins fall in that chronology, but you get the idea.

In between all of Kristin’s fertile myrtle-ness, she whips Erlend’s neglected homestead into shape. By the standards of the Middle Ages, Kristin turns out to be quite the wife…she’s competent, she can bear children, and she’s pious.

Thing is, she’s also a bit of a shrew. And normally, I’d resist using that term, because it’s also used to describe and belittle unshrewlike women. But in this case, I’m afraid it’s apropos. Kristin does not forgive. Except, oh wait, she does, later on when you least expect it.

Part 2 was my least favorite of the three books that constitute Kristin Lavransdatter. I felt it was about 5 kids too long.

Apologies for the lameness of this write-up, but check back at the end of December for my final thoughts.

 

moby dick button

 

Today, I’m starting another read-along. Yep, call me crazy, but I’m going to (try to) read Moby Dick. However, Ti has come up with a beautiful plan…4 pages a day. I figure I can handle that. Maybe. I fell asleep over page 3 the other night. Anyways…we hope to finish this chunkster some time next year. And we’ll be providing periodic updates on Mondays, so you can follow along with what could be either the agony or the ecstasy.

To start off though, I thought I would share with you all my one True Story about Moby Dick. While I’ve never read it, I was pretty much scarred for life by it back in high school.

Imagine. A class full of 10th graders. Advanced English. A teacher who was young, handsome, and knew it. We were discussing something (all but one lingering detail has faded from my mind) and the teacher made a comparison to Moby Dick. Only, he didn’t say Moby Dick. He said Moby the Dick.

And that was all he said, until he managed to choke out “class dismissed.”

Poor guy. To say he was embarrassed is an under-statement. And you can bet I’ve always thought twice about what I’m about to say everytime I have to say Moby Dick.

How about you…now that I’ve ruined Moby (the) Dick, do you have any literary slips of the tongue to share?

 

1dueling monsters read a long Dueling Monsters   Dracula wrap up

We’ve come to the end of our Dueling Monsters Read-a-long and I’m shedding a little tear (NOT of blood). Heather and I have had a great time getting to know Dracula and Frank a little better (but not too much better)…we hope you’ve had fun, too! Below is a list of bloggers who read (or are reading) Dracula for the read-a-long. Heather has a wrap-up of Frank over at Age 30+…A Lifetime of Books. Be sure to stop by and ask if anyone’s seen Ernest.

*Jackie wasn’t too fond of Dracula. But her copy of the book wins creepiest cover, hands down.

creepydracula1 Dueling Monsters   Dracula wrap up

(I had to make it nice and big so you can fully appreciate the bloodshot eyes. And the wart on his cheek. Who said vampires were sexy?)

*Books of Mee was less than enamored, too. She summed up her feelings with this line: BRING ME BACK TO THE CASTLE.

*Rebecca listened to the audio version, and decided she’s just not a fan of vampires (or dripping blood) at all.

*Last I heard, Dreamybee was still reading it, but she was a bit irked by the characters: “I just hit the part where Mina goes from independent intelligent woman to must-be-protected-from-all-the-ugliness-in-life flower, and it’s killing me. Is it just me, or does everyone turn into a raving idiot at this point?” Hmmm, yes, she does bring up an excellent point. Update: she has finished. And she liked. Woo-hoo!

*E.L. Fay read it awhile ago, but wrote a fascinating essay on vampires that I wanted to include. She also made a vampire playlist for Halloween. Dracula would approve.

*Brittanie is still working on it.

*And me? I thought it was great fun. Much more fun than Frank (I just had to add that final dig, since Heather says I can’t write anything about Dracula without bashing Frank in the process).

So, it seems the jury is still out on Dracula. What do you think? Kim asked me “Do you feel like one of the books aged better than the other one?” If you’ve read both, what do you think?

And if I missed your read-a-long thoughts on Dracula, please post a link in the comments and I’ll add it to the above list.

 

kristen Kristin Lavransdatter, The Wreath

I’m currently reading Kristin Lavransdatter, by Sigrid Undset, for a read-a-long. At over 1000 pages, this puppy is a chunkster. Luckily, it is comprised of three books (The Wreath, The Wife, and The Cross), and we’re reading a book a month. So what follows is my ramblings on The Wreath (and some of The Wife, since I’m about halfway through the entire thing at this point). And be warned…my ramblings include some pretty important plot points and other significant shit (and yes, that’s a literary term).

Sigrid Undset won the Nobel Prize back in the 1920’s, primarily for this book and another Norwegian saga. She is known for her sweeping tales of Norway in the Middle Ages. Kristin Lavransdatter is set during the 14th century. It is the story of Kristin (duh), the beloved daughter of Lavrans, a prosperous landowner and farmer. Kristin’s mother, Ragnfrid, is a bit distant. I’d say she suffers from depression, but in the book she just runs hot and cold. I actually feel bad for Ragnfrid…I think she got a bit of a raw deal from both her husband and her daughter, and the author. The Wreath sets up some tension between mother and daughter, yet by the time she dies (oh please, no squawking…at 1000+ pages you can’t tell me you didn’t see that coming) nothing had really come of it. I think Ragnfrid needed more air time, so to speak. I would’ve liked to have read more about her.

Anyhoosie, back to the story. Kristin is betrothed to Simon, a nice young man. However, after a near rape and the death of a close friend, she is sent to a nunnery for a year (to let gossip die down). There, she meets Erlend. While Erlend can do no wrong in Kristin’s eyes, he has been ex-communicated from the church for having two children with a married woman. Kristin is able to convince Simon to break the betrothal (no easy thing that, in 14th century Norway). But when news gets out about who she truly loves, Kristin’s father is appalled and refuses to let them marry. After many months spent moping around the family farm, her father finally relents. And when faced with such conversations as “Jesus Christus, little Kristin, are you so unhappy” - “I think I’m going to die from it, Father,” (p. 238) you can’t blame the man. And the fact that this book predates Twilight by almost 90 years is a good thing; otherwise I’d be crying that it was a Twilight knockoff. Okay, not really. The writing is much, much, much better. But the teenage angst? That is most definitely present.

And since that is essentially the end of Book 1 (well, there’s a marriage and whoopsie, Kristin realizes she’s preggers before the wedding), it’s now time to end the synopsis and dish.

I’m having mixed thoughts. On the one hand, I love the writing and the setting…the smoky halls…the fearsome wolves in the forest…the icy winters. And lowing cows. I just adore lowing cows…they’re so much more eloquent than when they moo, don’t you think? I know my synopsis sounds kind of soap opera-ey, but the book certainly doesn’t read that way. Undset is good at sneaking in historical stuff in a subtle way, so it’s like you’re right there with Kristin and the lice and the mite-ridden fish and the brewing ale.

However, the politics of 14th century can be a bit confusing (as I know squat about Norwegian history…and I’m too lazy to go read the endnotes, especially as they interrupt the flow of the story). At first, I wasn’t too concerned about not understanding, but as I get further into Book 2 I realize that the politics are going to impact the story. So…uh-oh. Also, Kristin needs to get over herself. She has quite the talent for self-recrimination, and for other-recrimination, too. If she doesn’t shape up, I’m going to loathe her by Book 3. As we know from Frankenstein, I have little patience for “oh woe is me” characters. And while Kristin isn’t really “oh woe” she is a bit “what have I done.” She also has a disturbing tendency to cry as soon as a conversation starts not going her way. I’m this close to tossing her a hair shirt and telling her to get over herself.

However, what makes me want to bop the characters over the head is part of what makes this book timeless. Undset wrote flawed characters. They doubt themselves (and we’re talking some serious, serious doubting). They screw up. They’re jealous. They’re accusatory. They’re, well, you get the idea.

Another reason for the genius of this book is that it deals with themes that are still applicable today. Kristin is a disobedient daughter. She refuses to listen to what others have to say about her boyfriend. She has premarital sex. She loves her boyfriend so much she could die. See, it’s just like Twilight! Okay, kidding, but still.

There is also some heavy religious stuff that I’m struggling with. These people go to mass all the freakin’ time! And the emphasis on chastity and being born within wedlock and recrimination and repenting is almost too much. But then, this is the Middle Ages. I’m torn between wondering if Undset was serious (she converted to Catholicism later in life) or if I’m supposed to want to bop everyone on the head. The one thing I do know is that I am forever grateful I wasn’t a woman (or a man) during this time. I love refrigeration and indoor plumbing way too much.

So there you go. Yes, I like the book and I’m glad I’m reading it. No, I’m not loving the characters, but the immersion into history is totally worth it.

 

Dracula

dracula Dracula


The New Annotated Dracula
Bram Stoker
2008 (Dracula first published 1897)
672 pages (because there’s lots of other stuff)


Just as there is no Igor in Frankenstein, there is no saying of “I vant to suck your blood” in Dracula.

Oh well. It’s still a great read.

I have been wanting to read Dracula for quite some time. It’s pretty much the grand-daddy of vampire fiction, and I was curious as to what the real story was (so to speak). It’s easy to think you know the story, what with all of the books and movies and tv shows and pop culture about vampires.

What surprised me the most about Dracula was how easy it was to read. It’s told in an epistolary format, through letters and journals of most of the major characters. So I never felt like I was wading through dense text and flowery language, like I usually do when I read older novels. Sure, there are moments when you want to bop the characters on the head for their sheer stupidity (case in point: vowing not to leave Lucy alone, and then, well, leaving Lucy alone). But overall, this is an entertaining read and pretty much a primary source for the industry that seems to have popped up around the cult of the vampire.

Unlike Frankenstein, I won’t subject you to a blow by blow account of the story. But I am going to compare the novels a bit.

For some reason, I think it was easier to not take Dracula seriously. And I don’t mean seriously in terms of do vampires exist, but rather as a serious work of fiction. Frankenstein seemed like it wanted to be more literary, whereas Dracula wanted to be more entertaining. Consequently, I was entertained by Dracula and annoyed by Frankenstein.

However, both books offer interesting glimpses into what concerned society at the time. Frankenstein, written at the beginning of the 19th century, is concerned with science and ethics. And it’s still applicable today…in fact, it would be easy to compare the novel to Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, with its focus on genetic modification. I’m not going to go there, though. Dracula, on the other hand, is more about the supernatural, and how modern methods and rational thinking can defeat supernatural evil. Although almost 100 years separate the two books, it’s almost as if Dracula is the older of the two.

Another interesting focus of both books is the role of women. In Dracula, Mina is represented as the New Woman, yet as the novel goes on, she seems to slip into a subservient role as the men vow to protect her. In Frankenstein, the women are almost all portrayed as the perfect mother, or the perfect daughter. They are all loving and nurturing, but they are also all minor characters. At least Lucy and Mina get equal time! Still, considering when these books were written, it’s not surprising. However, given that Frankenstein was written by a woman (although initially published anonymously) one would think that novel would have had stronger female characters. Although I guess their strength could be measured by their attentiveness to the ass that was Frankenstein.

Oh, did I just bash a main character? Why yes, I did. Ultimately, the reason why I much prefer Dracula is because the character of Frankenstein (the scientist, not the monster, although the scientist was a monster in his own way) was a whiny, pathetic loser who refused to own up to his mistake and stop a horrible progression of events. He also seemed to expect that everyone feel sorry for him, and help him, and let him wallow in his misery (but still help him). Also, can anyone tell me what happened to Ernest Frankenstein?!? If The Creature vowed to kill off the family, why was Ernest spared? And why did he just disappear from the book? And okay, laugh at the fact that I can go along with all the ridiculousness that is Dracula, but then nit-pick about Ernest.

I might have felt differently about Frankenstein had I read it first, although I kind of doubt it. For both entertainment and imagery, I found Stoker to be the superior teller of tales. Therefore, in the duel between Dracula and Frank, I have to declare Dracula as the resounding winner.

1dueling monsters read a long Dracula

On Saturday I’ll be doing a recap post of everyone’s thoughts on Dracula. So check back then to see how he fared elsewhere! And don’t forget to check in with Heather to see what others thought about Frank.

 

Frankenstein

frank Frankenstein


Frankenstein
Mary Shelley
1818
275 pages

I read this for our Dueling Monsters Read-a-long. And since I read the “Enriched Classic” I hereby give you my Enriched Review, complete with Major Spoilers.

As much as I would like to treat all monsters equally, I just can’t. And as much as I usually prefer female authors, this time I can’t do that, either. I got so frustrated with Frankenstein that I subjected my friend Rochelle to a rant about it. It went something like this:

SD: Frankenstein isn’t even the name of the monster. That’s the scientist! The monster is just The Creature.

R: What?

SD: And there’s no Igor!

R: No Igor??

SD: Okay, so there’s this scientist (Frankenstein) and he goes away to college and he creates this Creature. And then he’s all “Ack! What have I done?” And he runs away. And The Creature runs away. But then The Creature turns back up, and he starts killing off Frankenstein’s (the scientist) family. And Frankenstein (the scientist) is all “Oh woe is me, what have I done?” and he’s majorly depressed and all boo-hoo and his family coddles him but he can’t tell them what he’s done. And The Creature threatens to keep offing the family unless Frankenstein (the scientist) makes him a companion so he has someone to love, because everyone hates him. And the scientist (Frankenstein) is all “Hell no.” But then he says okay. Then he goes to England and Ireland for two years to make The Creature a creature. On his father’s dime.

R: Ah, the bride.

SD: Except there’s no Igor! So he makes the female creature. Monster. Whatever. Except then he sees The Creature peeking in the window and he kills it. No, wait, it’s not alive yet. He destroys it. Then he runs. And gets sick again. Because his BFF turns up dead. So he’s all “Woe is me, blah, blah, blah.” Then he goes back home to marry his cousin, who’s like a sister because she was raised with his family.

R: What?!?

SD: Except The Creature has promised that Bad Shit will happen on his wedding night, so he’s all “Oh woe is me.” Again. And then they get married. And the cousin/wife is killed by The Creature on their wedding night.

R: What?!?

SD: And then his dad dies of grief, and his brother Ernest disappears. The Creature promised to kill off the entire family, bit I never did figure out what, if anything, happened to brother Ernest. That bugs. Then they take off chasing each other across the Arctic, and Frankenstein (the scientist) is picked up by a ship (it’s the captain who is telling this story to his sister, as Frankenstein (the scientist) told it to him…see, it’s a story within a story within a story) or a boat or maybe it’s a ship. Whatever. Then he tells the story and he dies and The Creature shows up and is all “Oh woe…” and then he vows to go off and build a big funeral pyre and jump into it.

R: What?!?

SD: Oh, and The Creature is really, really well-spoken. He uses big words.

R: He doesn’t go Arrr??

And okay, since I didn’t tape record my rant, this is a very loose reconstruction, and Rochelle has more intelligent things to say than “What?!?”, although I’m pretty sure she did toss a few in. Especially when it came to the whole name thing, and the cousin love.

This is what happens when I read classics. I get so annoyed I can’t take them seriously. I’ll try to be more serious when I write my Dracula post and compare the two novels, although I’m pretty sure you can already guess which monster I prefer.