1dueling monsters read a long Dueling Monsters   Dracula wrap up

We’ve come to the end of our Dueling Monsters Read-a-long and I’m shedding a little tear (NOT of blood). Heather and I have had a great time getting to know Dracula and Frank a little better (but not too much better)…we hope you’ve had fun, too! Below is a list of bloggers who read (or are reading) Dracula for the read-a-long. Heather has a wrap-up of Frank over at Age 30+…A Lifetime of Books. Be sure to stop by and ask if anyone’s seen Ernest.

*Jackie wasn’t too fond of Dracula. But her copy of the book wins creepiest cover, hands down.

creepydracula1 Dueling Monsters   Dracula wrap up

(I had to make it nice and big so you can fully appreciate the bloodshot eyes. And the wart on his cheek. Who said vampires were sexy?)

*Books of Mee was less than enamored, too. She summed up her feelings with this line: BRING ME BACK TO THE CASTLE.

*Rebecca listened to the audio version, and decided she’s just not a fan of vampires (or dripping blood) at all.

*Last I heard, Dreamybee was still reading it, but she was a bit irked by the characters: “I just hit the part where Mina goes from independent intelligent woman to must-be-protected-from-all-the-ugliness-in-life flower, and it’s killing me. Is it just me, or does everyone turn into a raving idiot at this point?” Hmmm, yes, she does bring up an excellent point. Update: she has finished. And she liked. Woo-hoo!

*E.L. Fay read it awhile ago, but wrote a fascinating essay on vampires that I wanted to include. She also made a vampire playlist for Halloween. Dracula would approve.

*Brittanie is still working on it.

*And me? I thought it was great fun. Much more fun than Frank (I just had to add that final dig, since Heather says I can’t write anything about Dracula without bashing Frank in the process).

So, it seems the jury is still out on Dracula. What do you think? Kim asked me “Do you feel like one of the books aged better than the other one?” If you’ve read both, what do you think?

And if I missed your read-a-long thoughts on Dracula, please post a link in the comments and I’ll add it to the above list.

 

Dracula

dracula Dracula


The New Annotated Dracula
Bram Stoker
2008 (Dracula first published 1897)
672 pages (because there’s lots of other stuff)


Just as there is no Igor in Frankenstein, there is no saying of “I vant to suck your blood” in Dracula.

Oh well. It’s still a great read.

I have been wanting to read Dracula for quite some time. It’s pretty much the grand-daddy of vampire fiction, and I was curious as to what the real story was (so to speak). It’s easy to think you know the story, what with all of the books and movies and tv shows and pop culture about vampires.

What surprised me the most about Dracula was how easy it was to read. It’s told in an epistolary format, through letters and journals of most of the major characters. So I never felt like I was wading through dense text and flowery language, like I usually do when I read older novels. Sure, there are moments when you want to bop the characters on the head for their sheer stupidity (case in point: vowing not to leave Lucy alone, and then, well, leaving Lucy alone). But overall, this is an entertaining read and pretty much a primary source for the industry that seems to have popped up around the cult of the vampire.

Unlike Frankenstein, I won’t subject you to a blow by blow account of the story. But I am going to compare the novels a bit.

For some reason, I think it was easier to not take Dracula seriously. And I don’t mean seriously in terms of do vampires exist, but rather as a serious work of fiction. Frankenstein seemed like it wanted to be more literary, whereas Dracula wanted to be more entertaining. Consequently, I was entertained by Dracula and annoyed by Frankenstein.

However, both books offer interesting glimpses into what concerned society at the time. Frankenstein, written at the beginning of the 19th century, is concerned with science and ethics. And it’s still applicable today…in fact, it would be easy to compare the novel to Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, with its focus on genetic modification. I’m not going to go there, though. Dracula, on the other hand, is more about the supernatural, and how modern methods and rational thinking can defeat supernatural evil. Although almost 100 years separate the two books, it’s almost as if Dracula is the older of the two.

Another interesting focus of both books is the role of women. In Dracula, Mina is represented as the New Woman, yet as the novel goes on, she seems to slip into a subservient role as the men vow to protect her. In Frankenstein, the women are almost all portrayed as the perfect mother, or the perfect daughter. They are all loving and nurturing, but they are also all minor characters. At least Lucy and Mina get equal time! Still, considering when these books were written, it’s not surprising. However, given that Frankenstein was written by a woman (although initially published anonymously) one would think that novel would have had stronger female characters. Although I guess their strength could be measured by their attentiveness to the ass that was Frankenstein.

Oh, did I just bash a main character? Why yes, I did. Ultimately, the reason why I much prefer Dracula is because the character of Frankenstein (the scientist, not the monster, although the scientist was a monster in his own way) was a whiny, pathetic loser who refused to own up to his mistake and stop a horrible progression of events. He also seemed to expect that everyone feel sorry for him, and help him, and let him wallow in his misery (but still help him). Also, can anyone tell me what happened to Ernest Frankenstein?!? If The Creature vowed to kill off the family, why was Ernest spared? And why did he just disappear from the book? And okay, laugh at the fact that I can go along with all the ridiculousness that is Dracula, but then nit-pick about Ernest.

I might have felt differently about Frankenstein had I read it first, although I kind of doubt it. For both entertainment and imagery, I found Stoker to be the superior teller of tales. Therefore, in the duel between Dracula and Frank, I have to declare Dracula as the resounding winner.

1dueling monsters read a long Dracula

On Saturday I’ll be doing a recap post of everyone’s thoughts on Dracula. So check back then to see how he fared elsewhere! And don’t forget to check in with Heather to see what others thought about Frank.

 

Frankenstein

frank Frankenstein


Frankenstein
Mary Shelley
1818
275 pages

I read this for our Dueling Monsters Read-a-long. And since I read the “Enriched Classic” I hereby give you my Enriched Review, complete with Major Spoilers.

As much as I would like to treat all monsters equally, I just can’t. And as much as I usually prefer female authors, this time I can’t do that, either. I got so frustrated with Frankenstein that I subjected my friend Rochelle to a rant about it. It went something like this:

SD: Frankenstein isn’t even the name of the monster. That’s the scientist! The monster is just The Creature.

R: What?

SD: And there’s no Igor!

R: No Igor??

SD: Okay, so there’s this scientist (Frankenstein) and he goes away to college and he creates this Creature. And then he’s all “Ack! What have I done?” And he runs away. And The Creature runs away. But then The Creature turns back up, and he starts killing off Frankenstein’s (the scientist) family. And Frankenstein (the scientist) is all “Oh woe is me, what have I done?” and he’s majorly depressed and all boo-hoo and his family coddles him but he can’t tell them what he’s done. And The Creature threatens to keep offing the family unless Frankenstein (the scientist) makes him a companion so he has someone to love, because everyone hates him. And the scientist (Frankenstein) is all “Hell no.” But then he says okay. Then he goes to England and Ireland for two years to make The Creature a creature. On his father’s dime.

R: Ah, the bride.

SD: Except there’s no Igor! So he makes the female creature. Monster. Whatever. Except then he sees The Creature peeking in the window and he kills it. No, wait, it’s not alive yet. He destroys it. Then he runs. And gets sick again. Because his BFF turns up dead. So he’s all “Woe is me, blah, blah, blah.” Then he goes back home to marry his cousin, who’s like a sister because she was raised with his family.

R: What?!?

SD: Except The Creature has promised that Bad Shit will happen on his wedding night, so he’s all “Oh woe is me.” Again. And then they get married. And the cousin/wife is killed by The Creature on their wedding night.

R: What?!?

SD: And then his dad dies of grief, and his brother Ernest disappears. The Creature promised to kill off the entire family, bit I never did figure out what, if anything, happened to brother Ernest. That bugs. Then they take off chasing each other across the Arctic, and Frankenstein (the scientist) is picked up by a ship (it’s the captain who is telling this story to his sister, as Frankenstein (the scientist) told it to him…see, it’s a story within a story within a story) or a boat or maybe it’s a ship. Whatever. Then he tells the story and he dies and The Creature shows up and is all “Oh woe…” and then he vows to go off and build a big funeral pyre and jump into it.

R: What?!?

SD: Oh, and The Creature is really, really well-spoken. He uses big words.

R: He doesn’t go Arrr??

And okay, since I didn’t tape record my rant, this is a very loose reconstruction, and Rochelle has more intelligent things to say than “What?!?”, although I’m pretty sure she did toss a few in. Especially when it came to the whole name thing, and the cousin love.

This is what happens when I read classics. I get so annoyed I can’t take them seriously. I’ll try to be more serious when I write my Dracula post and compare the two novels, although I’m pretty sure you can already guess which monster I prefer.

 

Dueling Monsters update

Dracula and Frank say hi.  They want to know how you’re enjoying their stories.

1dueling monsters read a long Dueling Monsters update

Are you participating in the Dueling Monsters read-a-long?  It’s not too late to join!  Heather and I will be doing a wrap-up of everyone’s posts at the end of the month, so there’s still plenty of time to grab a monster er, book, and start reading.

Those who expressed interest in reading Dracula are listed here:

Jackie at Farm Lane Books—Dreamybee at Subliminal Intervention—Becky at Becky’s Book Reviews—Mee at Books of Mee—Amy at My Friend Amy—Melydia at Utter Randomonium (who has laready written up a post)—Brittanie at A Book Lover—Michelle at Fluttering Butterflies

And don’t worry, if it’s not happening, I won’t hunt you down and pin you with a stake until you read it. Dracula might, but I won’t.

If you are reading along, how’s it going? I finished Dracula last week and found it surprisingly readable. I’m about to start Frankenstein…I would’ve started earlier, but I’m pretty sure Dracula got a bit jealous and hid the book from me.  I just found it stashed away in a drawer, of all places. And now I’m staring at the cover, which says “Enriched Classic.” Does that mean it’s got extra iron or something? Seriously, that’s the first time I’ve ever seen that phrase used on a book cover.

frank Dueling Monsters update

Heather at Age 30+…A Lifetime of Books is also posting an update today, so stop by her blog to say hi to Frank and see how everyone else is doing.

 

Are you participating in our Dueling Monsters read-a-long?  If so, here is some background info on Dracula, as well as a few questions for you to consider as you read the novel.  If you are reading Frankenstein (and just keep in mind, Dracula would NOT be happy to hear that), Heather is posting Frank’s info and questions over at Age 30+…A Lifetime of Books.

1dueling monsters read a long Dracula   background info and questions

Bram Stoker’s Dracula

Vampires seem to pop up everywhere…they are exceedingly, well, popular, in popular culture.  Although Bram Stoker did not invent the vampire, his novel has been instrumental in spreading the cult of the vampire, if I can call it that. Just think of all the places vampires appear…they’re even on Sesame Street!  And your cereal box!  That is, if you eat Count Chocula.

Dracula was first published in 1897. Stoker (8 November 1847–20 April 1912) was an Irish novelist and short story writer. Some of his other works include The Lair of the White Worm (bonus points if you’ve seen that movie), The Lady of the Shroud and The Snake’s Pass.  He seemed to specialize in horror and creep. However, he spent most of his adult life as the assistant to actor Henry Irving and business manager of the Lyceum Theatre in London.  It is said that many of Dracula’s mannerisms were modeled after Henry Irving.

The original title for Dracula was The Un-Dead, and the character of Dracula originally went by the name Count Wampyr.  However, in his research, Stoker came across the legend of Vlad the Impaler, whose family name was Dracul, meaning both dragon and devil.  Other than the name, there is no indication that Vlad the Impaler was the model for Dracula. So just wipe that thought out of your mind.

Although Dracula was marginally popular when first published, it was only after the movie adaptations appeared that the popularity of Dracula soared (you know, like a bat). However, the Daily Mail review of June 1, 1897 was quite appreciative of the novel:

“In seeking a parallel to this weird, powerful, and horrorful story our mind reverts to such tales as The Mysteries of Udolpho, Frankenstein, The Fall of the House of Usher… but Dracula is even more appalling in its gloomy fascination than any one of these.”

Some of themes in the novel include the role of women in Victorian culture, conventional and conservative sexuality, immigration and invasion (you know, because Dracula was an interloper and wanted to take over England.  Don’t laugh…invasion was a big worry at the time, as the British were a bit concerned about all of those oppressed colonists), science and folklore.

And finally, because it’s Banned Books Week, I can’t not mention that Draculahas been challenged for its erotic overtones. In 1994, it was eliminated from required reading lists for advanced English classes in Lewisville, Texas because “the book contains unacceptable descriptions in the introduction, such as ‘Dracula is the symptom of a wish, largely sexual, that we wish we did not have.’”

********************

Some questions to keep in mind as you read the book (and this is where I confess to blatantly stealing getting inspiration from the Random House, Modern Library edition of Dracula and shmoop.com):

1. Dracula relies on journal fragments, letters, and newspaper clippings to tell its story. Why might Stoker have chosen to narrate the story in this way? Do letters and journal entries make the story seem more authentic or believable to you? How would the story be different if there were one traditional narrator?

2. Why does Dracula only drink the blood of English women? Why doesn’t he drink, say, Jonathan Harker’s blood when he has the chance? Why is Lucy Dracula’s first target? What makes her vulnerable?

3. Think about the roles of Lucy Westenra and Mina Harker in the novel. How are the two women similar? Different? What accounts for their differences? How does Mina epitomize both the traditional role of women as mother and the New Woman? To what extent does the novel depend on both of these women to propel the narrative forward?

4. Sexuality plays a large role in Dracula. Would you say that Dracula attempts to reproduce himself sexually or by some other means? In what way is the novel a reflection of Victorian norms? Or is it?

5. What are the elements of vampire folklore? For example, what, according to the novel, attracts or repels a vampire? How do you kill a vampire for good? Although Stoker did not invent the mythology of the vampire, his novel firmly established the conventions of vampire fiction. Think of another novel that deals with vampires and compare it with Dracula. (Interview with a Vampire, Twilight…) In what ways are the novels similar? Different?

6. Consider Freud’s essay “The Uncanny” in relation to Stoker’s Dracula. How would Freud describe the world that Stoker evokes in the novel? Is this a world of common reality? Or is it a world governed by supernatural belief? Or both? What do you think of Freud’s claim that the writer of Gothic fiction is “betraying to us the superstitiousness which we have ostensibly surmounted; he deceives us by promising to give us the sober truth, and then after all overstepping it.” In what ways does Stoker’s narrative strategy of employing newspaper clippings and journal entries promise the “sober truth”? To what extent do you think Dracula achieves a sense of the uncanny?

7. What do you think Dracula is referring to when he says, “Yes, I too can love; you yourselves can tell it from the past” ? Does he have a tragic love story in his past? Are we supposed to sympathize with Dracula?  Do you ever feel sorry for him?

8. Why do Arthur Holmwood and Quincey Morris never contribute journal entries? How would the novel be different if all the characters narrated an equal amount of the time?

9. And finally, how do you think Renfield finds out about Dracula in the first place?

Also, if you are reading both novels:

10. Did you enjoy one book more than the other? Why?

11. Was one monster scarier than the other?

12. Did either book (or both) surprise you? Was the story what you expected? Were the monsters what you expected? How do the books compare to the stereotypes?

********************

Happy (scary?) reading!  Don’t forget, we’ll be doing a check-in post midway through the month, on 10/15.

 

Dueling Monsters*

October is a spooky month! And to help you get in the mood, Heather of Age 30+ … A Lifetime of Books and I are hosting a month of Dueling Monsters!

1dueling monsters read a long Dueling Monsters*

Here at Fizzy Thoughts we’ll be staking reading Bram Stoker’s DRACULA. Those other ghouls at Age 30+ … A Lifetime of Books will be confronting taking on FRANKENSTEIN. Heather and I will both post discussion questions for our own book as well as questions comparing the two (in case you’ve read both).

Posting Schedule

  • 10/1 – we begin with a list of questions to consider as you read – I’ll post mine here later today
  • 10/15 – we’ll do an update post to see how everyone is coming along
  • 10/31 – we’ll post a recap of the read-a-long with links to each participants review

1dueling monsters read a long2 Dueling Monsters*

Why Read About Monsters?

If you’ve ever thought about reading either (or both) books, now’s the time. Reading about monsters is always safer when you’re amongst friends. And rumor has it they’re spooktacular, oops, I mean spectacular, reads. Please join us…it’ll be fun! Plus, you can post one of the nifty buttons that Heather made on your blog!

Sign Up Now

There’s no official sign up for this read-a-long, just leave a comment letting us know to include you and which book you’ll be reading. Then be sure to check in either here or at Age 30+ … A Lifetime of Books for the update and recap posts. And feel free to use either of the buttons above on you blog!

*Garlic, stakes and crosses not included.

********************

Also, a big thank you to Heather for taking the lead on this and getting our read-a-long off the ground!  She rocks!