Come In and Cover Me

come in and cover me Come In and Cover Me

Come In and Cover Me
Gin Phillips
2012
342 pages

Ren sees dead people (remember that movie?).

I know, this sounds like potentially a very bad set up (at least in my experience), but Phillips totally pulls it off. I loved this book wholeheartedly. I loved it so much I read it all in one day, and I think that qualifies it for the first marathon reading session of 2012 (although I could be wrong…while the year is flying by, January also feels like a really long time ago…go figure).

So anyhoosie. Ren (short for Aurenthia, of all things) is an archaeologist noted for her discovery of some obscure bowls. She’s also a bit (okay…a lot) of an emotional wasteland. Her older brother died when she was a young girl, and her family pretty much fell apart afterwards. To say she is emotionally distant is an understatement.

When Ren’s obscure pottery turns up at another archaeological dig, she heads out to see if she can uncover more of her mysterious potter’s history. As she works with (and falls in love with) Silas (the other archaeologist), Ren is forced to face her fears about love and loss, and also come to grips with her desire to force a story upon the past, both her own past and the historical past (and really, that makes sense, I swear).

Okay, so I’m not ‘splainin’ things very well, but Phillips really does a tremendous job with this story. Just as her first book, The Well and the Mine, was steeped in the south, this book is, well…not. It’s filled with archaeology and the southwest. Seriously, people…filled. I almost wanted to stop reading and take the book to Tucson with me, but I also didn’t want to wait that long to finish reading it. And okay, so it’s not really the modern southwest that I’ll be seeing in Tucson, but still…it was dry and hot and dusty and there were creepy bugs and pueblos and other things that I associate with the southwest. It’s obvious that Phillips did her research. For someone who wrote a very southern first book, this new setting came as a total surprise, in a very good way, because I love it when second books are so different but still so good.

I’m rambling, aren’t I?

Basically, all you need to know is that 1) I loved this book and 2) it’s very different from The Well and the Mine (which I also loved) and 3) I can’t wait for her next book.

Posted in book love, bookish thoughts | 17 Comments

Persuasion

persuasion 300x300 Persuasion

Persuasion
Jane Austen
First published a long time ago
272 pages in my Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition

********************

Some random things:

1. I read this for A Classic’s Challenge (except I didn’t do any of the challenge posts this month). Originally, I was going to read Emma. But when I went to the bookstore and saw the size of Emma, I wimped out. Then I saw this adorably creepy cover of Persuasion, and I decided to read it instead. Seriously. I chose my Austen based on the best cover. Okay, and the shorter length. Hey, when you’ve failed multiple times at Pride and Prejudice, cute covers and shorter lengths become very important.

2. The cover is by Audrey Niffenegger (yes, the author who is also an illustrator). Isn’t that cool?

3. There’s also an intro by Colm Tóibín, but I skipped it. Intros to classics and I historically don’t have a good relationship.

4. My thoughts on the book itself? Well, they go something like this…hmmm, this Austen, she ain’t half bad…oooh, tension, way to go Austen!…good lord, she sure can get in her jabs at shallow women, way to go Austen!….okay, it’s kinda boring since nothing’s happening….damn, Wentworth can write a love letter, I think I’m in love, even if I know nothing else about the man…hey wait, they probably spoke five times in the whole book and suddenly they’re back together??? what’s up with that?

5. I have officially finished an Austen. Will there be more? Maybe, maybe not. Okay, probably not.

6. You know, I’ve been to Bath twice. I’m not crazy about it, either.

7. I typed Austin instead of Austen through this entire post before I thought that might not be right and I googled it and then had to go back and correct my typos. Between Bath and the typos, I think I’ve been banned from ever joining any Austen fan clubs.

Posted in A Classics Challenge, bookish thoughts, challenges | 24 Comments

A People’s Readalong: week 7

zinn readalong2 A Peoples Readalong: week 7

Welcome to week seven of A People’s Readalong. A group of us (see the end of the post for the group, and please shout out if I’ve overlooked you) will be reading one chapter a week from Howard Zinn’s classic history book, A People’s History of the United States. We’ll be finished sometime in July. icon biggrin A Peoples Readalong: week 7

**Important announcement: Jenners and I have made an executive decision to move to post every OTHER week (and in the interest of full disclosure, this is mostly to preserve the mental health of your beleaguered hosts, who are struggling with Zinn). We’ll still be reading a chapter a week, but the posts will be every two weeks. So after today, my next post will be March 12th, and it will feature chapters 8 and 9. You, of course, are free to do whatever you want. icon biggrin A Peoples Readalong: week 7

Now onto this week’s reading, which was Chapter 7: As Long as Grass Grows or Water Runs. The title of the chapter comes from instructions given by President Jackson (who is pretty much the anti-Christ when it comes to Native American history):

“Say to the chiefs and warriors that I am their friend, that I wish to act as their friend but they must, by removing from the limits of the States of Mississippi and Alabama and by being settled on the lands I offer them, put it in my power to be such – There, beyond the limits of any State, in possession of land of their own, which they shall possess as long as Grass grows or water runs. I am and will protect them and be their friend and father.” p. 133-134

To which I say, “Liar, liar, pants on fire.”

I read this chapter as I was reading Rez Life, a book by David Treuer that talks about treaties and reservations (although that’s not the sole focus of the book…it’s just the part that intersected nicely with Zinn’s chapter). It was totally accidental, but made for a great companion read. Treuer’s book offers a lot more detail on treaty rights and broken promises and how the American government has used Native Americans and their lands throughout the history of this country. It’s also very readable and personal, as Treuer interjects quite a bit of his own family’s story into the book. In fact, he alternates between general history and personal history, so the book never gets bogged down with dry historical details. Like, you know, some other authors involved in this post.

Anyhoosie, the whole point of this chapter is to show how Native Americans were forced off of their land to accommodate not only the westward movement of Americans, but so that greedy capitalists could exploit the valuable land that the Native Americans inhabited. Lumber, minerals, and all sorts of natural resources were more valuable to the American government than the rights of the Native Americans, and therefore they were pushed off of their land and promised new lands in exchange (and for some tribes, this happened multiple times). And all the while, the US government maintained a paternalistic attitude toward the tribes, which they considered children. This attitude made it easy to justify the greedy land grabbing, because the government obviously knew best and was only acting in the best interest of the tribes (that attitude is totally illustrated by that above quote from President Jackson). The whole thing reminds me of when men tell women “don’t you worry your pretty little head about things.”

So that’s my take on chapter 7…what did you think?

Readalong Participants:

Posted in A People's History, read-along | 4 Comments

Some weekend fizziness

It’s official…Jenners and I have vowed to never do another readalong together. We have the WORST luck with our books. Also, I think we’re both closet masochists. So if you ever see us plotting another readalong, do everyone a favor and slap us both upside the head.

I think I’m going to join the Cloud Atlas readalong that’s happening in March. Simply because it’s one of my Shelf of Doom books, and I’d really like to get it over with. Gee…I sure hope Jenners isn’t joining, too!

(Really, I like Jenners. She’s one of my favorite bloggers. And she has damn good taste in books…and I think I have pretty good taste in books, too. Unless we happen to be reading the same book at the same time. And then both of our tastes SUCK. Kinda makes me wonder what would happen if we were both in the same place at the same time. Tornado? Cyclone? Earthquake? Tsunami?)

When I was at the National Steinbeck Center I was surprised to learn just how many movies were made from John Steinbeck’s books. Don’t ask me how many….just know it seemed like a lot, probably because I’ve never seen any of them. Except as I type this The Grapes of Wrath is on tv. It looks sort of like The Beverly Hillbillies. (Have I ever mentioned I’m not really a fan of the old movies?) (And what are you supposed to do with tv shows…underline? italicize? quoticize?) Aaaaaaaand, now it’s not on tv. HB opted for a surf show, instead. What a shocker.

Hamburger just informed me that he had to read The Grapes of Wrath in high school. He also remembered who wrote it…I about fell out of my chair from shock. This may be the only book in existence that he’s read and I haven’t. I feel strangely compelled to read it right now. Except I don’t have it. Probably a good thing…I’ve got other things I should be reading.

Like A People’s History of the United States. *sigh*

Speaking of A People’s History, I’m reading about Manifest Destiny. Strangely enough, I’m listening (still) to Unfamiliar Fishes, and Vowell’s talking about Manifest Destiny, too. I’m ready for both Zinn and Vowell to move on.

I cleaned my entire house today. Which I realize is horribly unexciting. But HB didn’t even notice, so if someone could just toss out a “wow! the house looks great” I’d really appreciate it. Thanks.

I talked my cousin into getting Words With Friends and playing with me. Her first word? Freak. Yeah, well, I’m still younger than she is, so there.

Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments

Terracotta Warriors

One of my 12 for 12 things to do is to visit more museums this year (and it’s only February and I’ve already been to two!). While going to a museum just to look at artwork isn’t anything that really rocks my world (unless I happen to be in Paris or Florence, which is totally different), I do like to check out special exhibits every once in awhile. Especially if they’re out of town and I can get a little trip out of the deal.

This exhibit happened to be in Santa Ana, and since my relatives live close by, my mom and I combined it with a family visit. So while this wasn’t an exciting weekend trip, we did score some brownie points with the family and we got to see something interesting.

The Terracotta Warriors are part of the Terracotta Army discovered in the 1970s in China. Emperor Qin Shi Huang was buried with thousands of terracotta figures who would accompany him to the afterlife. There were archers and horsemen (and horses) and chariots and entertainers. And every single one was unique. The exhibit itself is small, and there are only a few of the life sized warriors. Originally, they were painted and held weapons. This archer was my favorite:

photo 8 e1329779446988 Terracotta Warriors

Imagine row after row after row of these guys, as well as horsemen and other figures.

photo 7 e1329779334997 Terracotta Warriors

It’s unknown exactly how many figures made up the army, but one estimate puts it around 8000. 8000! Holy crap! Think of the man-hours involved, as well as the land needed to surround the Emperor’s mausoleum with these guys (and gals…there’s some speculation that there were a few women in there).

While this was, hands down, my favorite part of the exhibit, there were also a few rooms filled with smaller funerary objects from the Han and Tang dynasties, as well as objects from the Famen Monastery. There was a set of boxes that once held a sacred relic…one of Buddha’s finger bones. The finger bone wasn’t included.

This Medicine Buddha was also part of the exhibit. Meditating upon Medicine Buddhas is said to result in an increase in healing powers and a decrease in physical and mental suffering. I think he looks very serene.

photo 5 e1329779286236 Terracotta Warriors

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

Wild Thing

wild thing Wild Thing

Wild Thing
Josh Bazell
narrated by Robert Petkoff and Stephanie Wolfe
8 hours 46 minutes

Wild thing…you make my heart sing…
You make everything
Groovy
I said wild thing…

Just like the song it’s named (titled?) for, this book makes me laugh. Maybe not as much as the first book, Beat the Reaper, did, but there were definitely a few laugh out loud moments. Good thing I was listening to the audio. Alone. In a car.

This is the perfect listen for a long, boring drive. Which may explain why I seem to like this one slightly more than the average bear (not that Other Jill or Jim or Dawn are average. Or bears, for that matter.).

In Wild Thing, Pietro Brnwa (aka Lionel Azimuth), our favorite former mobster is back. This time he’s going on a camping trip to find a mythical lake monster.

Really. Or, in language more in keeping with the book, I shit you not.

Along the way, there are side trips down memory lane (not Pietro/Lionel’s memory) to Vietnam, forays into science (thanks to Violet the side-kick), and discourses on politics (and have I mentioned that the choice for the person tapped to be the impartial ref was frickin’ brilliant?) and religion (once again, thanks to Violet, who was astonishingly brilliant with her comebacks to Mr. Fick the ass-hat).

Yes, there’s a lot going on in this book, but if you just go with it, it works. (Except for maybe the appendix, which I may have given up on, even though I know I shouldn’t have, but the road trip was over, and I didn’t really feel like listening to more science at 6:30 in the morning as I drove to work the next day). (And except for the over-use of a certain word that others have already discussed, and that yes, bugs me, but does work if you remember the character who is (over)using it.)

There’s also a lot of liberal politics and liberal swearing, so if you’re not really open to certain members of the Republican party being mocked, or listening to (or reading) a goodly number of swears, then I’d avoid this one like the plague. But if you thought Bazell’s first book was the best thing since sliced bread, this one is still worth a try. You might not like it as much as I did, but you should still get a few chuckles out of it and its ridiculousness.

Posted in audio books, bookish thoughts | 13 Comments

the National Steinbeck Center

When I mentioned that I was thinking of stopping in Salinas to visit the National Steinbeck Center, Other Jill warned me that there is nothing else in Salinas and I should pack a lunch.

She’s right.

Actually, I knew this because my college roommate was from Salinas (poor thing) and I visited her a few times during summer breaks. Salinas is only a two hour drive north of where I live, but it’s pretty much a foreign land (it’s inland, and surrounded by farmland, and honestly, there’s nothing of interest there (for someone from the coast) except for John Steinbeck stuff).

But I was on my way to Sacramento and figured it would be a good way to break up the five hour drive. And it was.

The National Steinbeck Center is actually pretty cool, despite it’s unassuming exterior.

photo 3 the National Steinbeck Center

It sticks out like a sore thumb though, since it’s at the end of the historical Main Street district (which was a pretty un-happening place). I was only there for an hour, so I just got an overview of things (while I wanted to visit the museum, I also wanted to get to Sacramento before dark). But I was able to see Rocinante (the truck Steinbeck drove around in for Travels with Charley…and I tried to take a picture of the surprisingly small interior of the camper but the flash bounced off of the Plexiglas…which kind of scared the hell out of me because I didn’t know my iPhone even had a flash),

photo the National Steinbeck Centerand get an overview of his life (I didn’t know he was married three times, or that he was a war correspondent, or that he had travelled through Russia and wrote a book about those travels (which I may have bought at the museum store)), and check out a few other treasures, such as this box that he carved for the manuscript of East of Eden (it says timshel):

photo 11 e1329777279380 the National Steinbeck Center

I also fell in love with this quote:

photo 2 e1329777385584 the National Steinbeck Center

So if you ever find yourself driving past Salinas (hey, it could happen…it’s on Highway 101 which runs down California and conveniently connects San Francisco to me and me to LA), this place is worth a stop.

 

 

Posted in museum-y stuff, travel | 11 Comments

Age

I got to hang with most of my extended family this past weekend. We’re a pretty small family, so this wasn’t that many people. I saw my 96 year old Granny (my dad’s mom), my two aunts (my dad’s older sisters), and 3 of my 4 cousins. And 1 cousin’s kid, whatever that relation works out to be.

Among the cousins (there are 6 of us altogether…3 sets of siblings, all of which are older brother-younger sister combos), I’m the baby. By seven years. A pretty significant age difference, and one that I’ve never let any of them forget, especially as we get older. I’ve kinda got a reputation as the sender of rude birthday cards. I take my job as the youngest very seriously.

Thing is, by the end of this year, all of those older cousins (and my brother) will be in their 50s. The two oldest of the older brothers are already 53, and my two female cousins turn 50 this month and in April. My brother will join them in November. At which point I’ll be the sole representative of the 40s for our family.

the pyramid 704x1024 Age

Back when I was the sole representative of teenagerdom in the family

So while 50 is the new 40 (or whatever), and I realize it’s not that old, it struck me this weekend that our family is still aging. Of the 6 cousins, only 3 ever had kids…and 2 of them are already grandfathers multiple times over (my brother got an early start, as did his son, so I’ve actually been a great-aunt for a number of years). It just seems so weird to have all those cousins that were once so cool ’cause they were driving/in college/grown-up and I wasn’t (note: they’re all still pretty damn cool) be 50. I mean, holy crap! I still think of my mom as 50 (if you could see my mom, you’d be thinking that, too).

So how the heck can my cousins be my mom’s age??

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments

A People’s Readalong: week 6

zinn readalong2 A Peoples Readalong: week 6

Welcome to week six of A People’s Readalong. A group of us (see the end of the post for the group, and please shout out if I’ve overlooked you) will be reading one chapter a week from Howard Zinn’s classic history book, A People’s History of the United States. We’ll be finished sometime in July. icon biggrin A Peoples Readalong: week 6

This week features Chapter 6: The Intimately Oppressed, in which Zinn addresses the subjugation of women. Specifically, how the idea developed that women should be dutiful wives and hard workers but god forbid they should voice an opinion. I was actually looking forward to this chapter because, hello…women’s history! And while it was interesting and sped by much too quickly, it still suffered from the “too many details for the chapter” syndrome. For example, in one short paragraph, Zinn managed to quote 4 separate books on the role of a dutiful woman. Two of the books quoted were from 1830 and 1850, and then two paragraphs later he’s quoting a sermon from 1808.

While I like examples and quotes from primary sources, there’s such a thing as too much. I also don’t like hopping around time periods, either, and I thought this chapter had too much crammed into its 22 pages. In fact, I’ll admit that I was a little disappointed in Zinn.  I think we got something like 200 years of the development of the passive role of women and the build-up to Seneca Falls in one short chapter, and then in the next chapter (which I was was hoping would be more on women…you know, like we had two plus chapters on the development of class and racism in America) Zinn freakin’ returned to the Indians. Not that I’m bashing the Native Americans, because I’ve already read Chapter 7 and it’s good, too. I just wanted more women’s history. It’s like we got a token, drive-by chapter. I seriously expected more from Zinn and if women don’t pop up again later (with more depth!), I’m going to be a bit peeved. And okay, yes, I know women are included in the other chapters, but not to the degree that men are. Zinn has moved away from Dead White Guy history, but in my opinion, he’s still heavy on the Dead GUYS. And his theories all seem to have an economic bent to them…has anyone else picked up on that?

Any other thoughts on Chapter 6? Pipe up, people!

Readalong Participants:

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments